Coast Guard ship’s logbook entry in verse on New Year’s Day, 1969

Share this:

True to tradition, an ensign aboard the U.S. Coast Guard cutter Pontchartrain composed a New Year’s Day 1969 logbook entry in verse, and a fine job he did of it. Ensign Hughes, Happy New Year to you, too, from 2023.

Cover image of USCGC Pontchartrain (WHEC-70) Log Book for January 1969

January 1, 1969 0000-0900

The great white Pontch is tied to pier C, berth 23.

All lines are weak and we hope they break free.

The night is cold and the sky is clear,

I was surprised to see old father time pass near.

We’re out of steam, receiving all power from shore

This New Year’s Eve on ship is a bore.

We’re controlled by a Commander with wisdom untold,

Who sits in the Eleventh Coast Guard District, I’m told.

There is another great white one astern (WHEC-67)

Whose record is not as impressive, I’ve learned.

At 0656 we looked to the East Line

And saw the sun shine on year sixty-nine.

The lights were turned out with a Boatswain’s mate’s shout; and the bottles of cheer were sink way on out.

At 0700 we rattled the racks

And the men got up with aching backs.

The men were tired from last night’s play

But like true Guardsmen, did the work of the day.

At 0800 the Stars and Stripes flew, and

We wish a Happy New Year to all of you.

January 1, 1969, log book entry in verse for USCGC Pontchartrain (WHEC-70)
Share this:
Posted in USCGC PONTCHARTRAIN | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Cruise Book of U.S. Coast Guard Cutter Pontchartrain From Vietnam 1970

Share this:
CDR LeRoy Reinburg Jr. with other officers aboard U.S. Coast Guard Cutter Pontchartrain, 1970
CDR LeRoy Reinburg, Jr. (left) with unidentified officers aboard USCGC Pontchartrain, 1970

“What did you do in the war, Daddy?” This is a question I thankfully have some answers to from my Dad’s writings and photos from Vietnam. In my role as custodian of family photos, I’m sometimes bowled over by items I come across. One recent discovery is something rare and amazing – the Coast Guard “cruise book” of the USCGC Pontchartrain (WHEC-70) during its time in Vietnam in 1970. My Dad (LeRoy Reinburg, Jr.) served as Commanding Officer for six months of the cutter’s ten-month deployment. The cruise book is a window into the Coast Guard’s service in the war and provides photos of the personnel on board along with short summaries of what they did and saw. This editor is grateful to the individuals from the Pontchartrain who compiled and printed this volume. I think it should be available for all who are interested in the Coast Guard’s history and service in Vietnam.

Thanks to the technical assistance of my husband, we post here a scanned, low-resolution PDF of the USCGC Pontchartrain’s 1970 cruise book from Vietnam. It’s an important and sometimes amusing record of life aboard the Pontchartrain during Operation Market Time in Vietnam in 1970. I’ve created an alphabetical list of all the names mentioned in the Pontch’s 1970 cruise book, as well (below). Browse the pages and tell us what you think. We’d love to hear your comments. The Coast Guard’s actions in Vietnam deserve wider attention; help us fill in the record. Were you there? What did you do in the war?

Image from U.S. Coast Guard Cutter Pontchartrain Cruise Book, Vietnam, 1970
Share this:
Posted in U.S. Coast Guard in Vietnam, USCGC PONTCHARTRAIN, Vietnam War | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Cu Lao Re: A Story of the Coast Guard in Vietnam, by CAPT LeRoy Reinburg, Jr.

Share this:

In the summer of 1970, I was the Commanding Officer of the U.S. Coast Guard Cutter Pontchartrain (WHEC-70), a unit of Coast Guard Squadron Three, Cruiser-Destroyer Group, U.S. Seventh Fleet. We were deployed to the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) and assigned to CTF 115, the Commander, Offshore Patrol Force. Our function was to interdict North Vietnamese trawlers, which were constantly trying to “run” our barrier patrol to supply arms, ammunition, and personnel to the Viet Cong, ashore in RVN. In addition, we provided Naval Gunfire Support (NGF) to friendly forces ashore.

Young child on shore of Cu Lao Re, Vietnam, 1970
Cu Lao Re, Vietnam, 1970 (Photos by LeRoy Reinburg, Jr.)

During periods of low operational intensity, we were encouraged to provide routine medical assistance to civilian populations ashore, since we carried a U.S. Public Health Service medical doctor. These operations were known as MEDCAPs (Medical Civil Actions Programs). Most of the combat operations ashore seemed to be at night, so our daylight hours were not very active, and it was during these times that we held MEDCAPs. The shoreline of Vietnam was dotted with small villages, and it wasn’t difficult to find one convenient to our operating area.

One of these villages was located on Cu Lao Re, a small volcanic island several miles off the coast, about fifty miles south of the large port of Da Nang. We anchored about a half a mile off the west side of the island and sent our small boat ashore with our RVN Navy interpreter to announce our intentions. He returned to say that the village chief was delighted to have our medical team come ashore and would pass the word among the villagers. Shortly thereafter, the doctor, the hospital corpsman, and several assistants departed by small boat with medical supplies. By this time, curious villagers were gathered on the beach. I decided to go ashore and witness the operation.

Children greeting the Ponchartrain’s CO on his arrival, Cu Lao Re, 1970

As the boat I was on approached the beach, we grounded about 50 yards from the shore, and I could see that I would have a long, wet trip to the beach. I didn’t anticipate that the villagers would send a “basket boat” to carry me to the beach. Basket boats at that time were everywhere. I had seen them launched by fishing boats to tend nets and to provide transportation from boat to shore. I had never seen one close aboard until I stepped carefully into this one, expecting that it would be very unstable. Surprisingly, it was not. It was round and about 10 feet in diameter, made of what appeared to be reeds woven like a typical basket, and covered with hard black pitch or resin to make it waterproof. Propulsion was by paddles, deftly handled by young men who were able rowers. The draft, even with several passengers, was only a few inches, and I stepped ashore without getting my feet wet. I was greeted by a crowd of small children, who stared and smiled and chattered among themselves. They surrounded me and accompanied me to the village.

I had seen villages in remote sections of Alaska and in the Philippines; however, I was not prepared for the simplicity and sanitation challenges of this one. People lived in thatched huts, interspersed with some small cinder-block structures with corrugated iron roofs, and large black flies were everywhere. I remember walking into the village square, which had a large flat pottery bowl in its center. The bowl had a mound in the center, which on closer inspection was composed of fermenting fish on a bed of large salt crystals. Between the mound and the rim of the bowl was a ring of dark brown liquid, which I found out later was soy sauce. Flies were crawling all over the mound and buzzing around it. The smell was overwhelming. As I stood looking at it, several villagers stopped, and taking small corked bottles from their belts, filled them by dipping them into the liquid. After they filled them, they took a long-handled dipper hanging on a nearby hook, dipped it into the liquid and poured it over the mound, no doubt to increase the flow of the fermented fish fluid. No one seemed to mind the flies, even though many, mostly the children, would have flies crawling on their faces. They never seemed to brush them off. I had smeared my exposed skin with bug repellent, but the flies still buzzed annoyingly around my head. I was told later that the “sauce” the people were dipping was called “nuoc mam,” a dietary staple, and everyone doused their food liberally with it.

People gather outside site where U.S. Coast Guard cutter Pontchartrain personnel provide MEDCAPS medical services, Cu Lao Re, Vietnam, 1970

I finally found a fairly large cinder-block structure, which looked as if it was a village store. There was a covered porch on the building, and villagers were lined up outside where the doctor and corpsman were providing medical care. Some of the villagers had their arms in slings; others had crude, dirty bandages on their bodies. One little girl, who appeared to be about five years old, had one of her eyes bright red and swollen shut. I talked to the doctor later about his experience, and he told me that most of the problems he treated were due to lack of cleanliness and sanitation and poor health practices. He gave a shot of penicillin to the little girl with the red eye, but he felt badly that he would never see her again for a follow-up.

Cu Lao Re, Vietnam, 1970

After I returned to the ship, I reflected on the challenges many people in the world continue to face without access to basic sanitation and safe living conditions. Even though most people we saw in the village were smiling and appeared to be happy, I knew we were far from meeting their basic needs through the occasional MEDCAPs mission. I was still thankful that we could at least do a little bit that day to assuage what I perceived to be their difficult living conditions.

Share this:
Posted in U.S. Coast Guard in Vietnam, USCGC PONTCHARTRAIN, Vietnam War | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Most Important Consideration in Wartime: A Vietnam Story, by Captain Leroy Reinburg, Jr., U.S. Coast Guard-Retired

Share this:

In the spring of 1970, the Coast Guard Cutter PONTCHARTRAIN, which I commanded, was sent on a fire support mission to destroy a North Vietnamese training facility on the seaward side of a mountain, Nui Da Dung, on the Vietnam-Cambodian border. The deployment of land artillery was not suited to do the job, thus my ship was chosen since it had a five-inch gun and drew considerably less water than the only other U.S. Navy ships with similar armament.

Photo of U.S. Coast Guard cutter PONTCHARTRAIN taken in January 1970

USCGC PONTCHARTRAIN (WHEC-70) in January 1970, just prior to Southeast Asia deployment.

As soon as I was briefed on the mission, I found that we would have to proceed about 25 miles across the Mekong Delta at the highest high tide of the year to the point 100 yards offshore where the mission would begin. As I recollect, my ship drew about 16 feet with a full liquid load, and the water depths along our track varied from 18 to 22 feet, a tight squeeze. Many years before, in Rongelap Atoll, Marianas Islands, I had to take my ship through shallow and unknown waters. At that time, I used portable fathometers mounted in ship’s boats that preceded us as we explored uncharted waters. The plan was to have the boat alert our ship to any shoaling. The boats did this by use of handie talkie portable radios. On many occasions, this practice saved us from going aground. Before we left our home port of Long Beach, California, I anticipated that once again we might have a need for these fathometers, and so I obtained three, just in case.

Ad for Handie Talkie radios, MotorolaMy foresight paid off as we proceeded across the mudflats of the Mekong Delta enroute to our firing position, preceded by our fathometer-equipped boats. Several times, we smelled bottom as our wake overtook us, and the ship perceptibly slowed enough for us on the bridge to lurch forward before it regained its speed. The big difference between our Rongelap mission and our current one was that we had to conduct our mission under EMCON, that is, no electromagnetic emissions. This problem was fairly easy to solve; we just used semaphore. The tide gave us enough time to reach our firing position and return, with one hour for the mission. Any seaman will tell you that you venture into shoal water at the highest tide of the year at your own peril. The worst-case scenario would cause us to remain in our firing position for a very, very long time, until we had enough water for our return journey.

Map showing U.S. Market Time Forces, Vietnam

U.S. Market Time Forces, Vietnam (Wikipedia)

As we approached our firing position, I ordered all loiterers to lay below decks and all exposed personnel to wear flack jackets and steel helmets. This was because we were less than 100 yards from the shoreline, which was heavily covered with thick mangrove bushes. We were in full view of our target, and I thought we might take unfriendly fire. We anchored with a gentle offshore breeze, which pointed our bow, and thus also our five-inch gun, toward our target. With the assistance of two (as we found out later) Marine Corps spotters, we opened fire on the target, throwing the NVA into a panic as the white phosphorous rounds found their mark. Halfway into the mission, the quartermaster reported to me that a Navy LCM was coming alongside, and I asked the quartermaster to find out what they wanted, thinking it must be some dire emergency for them to come alongside a ship which is engaged in a fire support mission. He returned with the information that they were from the Navy LST we passed four or five miles back. He said, “They want to swap movies!”

Share this:
Posted in U.S. Coast Guard in Vietnam, USCGC PONTCHARTRAIN, Vietnam War | Tagged , , , , , | 10 Comments

The Ship That Wouldn’t Stop, by Captain LeRoy Reinburg, Jr., U.S. Coast Guard–Retired

Share this:

Editor’s note: In the aftermath of the tragic collision between a Philippine-registered container ship, ACX Crystal, and the U.S. Navy destroyer U.S.S. Fitzgerald off the coast of Japan on June 17, 2017, I recalled my father, Capt. LeRoy Reinburg, Jr. (U.S. Coast Guard-Retired), had written about collisions and near collisions involving U.S. Coast Guard vessels. This previously unpublished piece about Reinburg’s experiences in the Coast Guard sheds light on how near collisions at sea appear to be more common than many of us realize. There are no requirements to report “near misses” at sea, but personal accounts like this one contribute useful information that might add to the general discussion of ship collisions.

___________________________________________________

On many occasions in my seagoing experience, I have encountered inexcusable negligence by ship operators. As a junior officer I was attached to several vessels that manned Ocean Weather Stations. These tours were perhaps the most challenging, because most of the time on station was so routine that there was a temptation to relax your vigilance. This was particularly so when on watch as the Officer of the Deck (OOD) on the bridge, far out at sea and in good weather. According to regulations, the OOD is responsible only to the commanding officer for the safety of the ship.

Ocean Weather Stations

The United States manned a number of weather stations, starting after World War II, in support of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), to act as a plane guard for aircraft transiting the North Atlantic, North Pacific Oceans, and the Gulf of Alaska. Their additional role was to transmit weather observations, including surface and upper air observations. This was before the days of weather satellites and Global Positioning System (GPS), when areas in the center of these bodies of water were not covered by electronic navigation systems, and weather reports from ships were sparse.

The Ocean Station Vessels (OSVs) were required to maintain station in a 210-mile square and operate a radio beacon continuously, with a code indicating its location in this grid. If the ship was in the center ten-mile square, the beacon transmitted its international call sign, such as November, for the station between San Francisco and Hawaii, followed by OS (on station) in Morse code. Transiting aircraft would home on this beacon, and could have a reasonable idea of their position.

The beacon worked fine for aircraft, but ships were another matter. Most merchant ships are equipped with automatic steering mechanisms, which with a gyro compass input allow the ship to literally “steer itself.” This isn’t actually true, since the ship’s course must be manually put into the steering mechanism. After that, no helmsman is necessary for the long ocean voyages, except to change course, usually once a day, if a great circle track is followed. Unfortunately, the practice all too often results in inattention to where the ship is headed, and sometimes, there are no personnel on the bridge for long periods of time!

For the Ocean Station Vessels (OSVs), there was a double hazard. Ships would “home” on the OSV’s radio beacon while at the same time steer the ship on automatic pilot. This sometimes meant that no one was on the bridge and the ship was headed directly for the OSV’s radio beacon. The problem was much worse at night. Surface search radar on the approaching ship could easily detect a stationary target, if anyone was monitoring it. The OSV had to keep a close watch on its surface search radar to detect approaching ships to avoid a collision. If a radar (or a visual) bearing on an approaching ship is steady, that is, if it doesn’t change, collision will be unavoidable unless one or the other takes action to either change course or position.

As the OOD, I actually experienced having ships at sea home on my ship. All attempts to contact the ship were unsuccessful by voice and Morse code radio. In several occasions, we were forced to shoot off flares before taking last minute evasive action to avoid a collision. There was obviously no one on the bridge and no lookout was posted. In more than one incident, after evasive action was taken, the approaching ship sailed blithely on, completely unaware of the near collision.

Near Collision During Vietnam War Near Subic Bay

Photo of U.S. Coast Guard cutter PONTCHARTRAIN taken in January 1970

USCGC PONTCHARTRAIN (WHEC-70) in January 1970, just prior to Southeast Asia deployment.

With this rather lengthy introduction, I will recount an incident, which took place early in 1970, just west of Subic Bay in the Philippines. My ship, the USCGC PONCHARTRAIN (WHEC-70), of which I was the commanding officer, was engaged in a live firing exercise, using a surface target towed by a U.S. Navy tug. The exercise protocol for one firing run required us to steam on a parallel course with the tug at a range of 5,000 yards, about 2.5 miles, and fire our 5″-38 caliber deck gun at the target. Our fall of shot was observed and reported by the tug. This was known as a calibration exercise and was required of all ships before they departed for the Vietnam combat zone.

Photo of USCGC Pontchartrain CO CDR LeRoy Reinburg, Jr.

CDR LeRoy Reinburg, Jr., U.S. Coast Guard. Commanding Officer of USCGC Pontchartrain (WHEC-70), Vietnam, July 1970.

A Notice to Mariners was sent out about the location and time of the live-firing exercise, and my ship made an announcement on the international distress and calling frequencies to warn surface and air traffic. We also hoisted the international code flag bravo at the dip, and we prepared to commence firing. The bridge lookout reported a merchant ship approaching from astern. We tracked the ship, which would pass between the target and us! All attempts to contact the ship yielded no results. As the ship passed us at about 1,000 yards, we used our bullhorn to contact them. It was obvious that no one was on the bridge or even on deck. It was proceeding on a steady course at 14 knots. As soon as the ship was clear, we commenced firing. If the other ship heard or saw the firing, it gave no outward sign!

 

Dry Tortugas Near Collision

Many years later, after I had retired from the Coast Guard, I was an observer on a “drugstore tanker,” that is, a tanker that carried an array of chemicals in its ten cargo tanks. I was working as a civilian on a Coast Guard contract to assess the safety of operations of deepwater ports, which were planned off the Gulf of Mexico Coast of the U.S. We departed Baltimore with empty tanks headed for the Gulf Coast to take on more cargo to be delivered to factories in the Mid-Atlantic States. Our track took us through the Straits of Florida and one half-mile south of the Florida Keys. We were following the U.S. Coast Pilot track to a point several miles west of the Dry Tortugas, the last islands in the Florida Keys. At this point, we would change course to a northwesterly direction and head for the Gulf Coast. I had had experience with these tracks before off the West Coast. North and south bound ships all head for the same point, creating potential collision situations.

Florida Keys map

Florida Keys map

Although I had never sailed in the Florida Keys before, Dry Tortugas looked like the same hazardous situation I had encountered while on Coast Guard vessels. As we approached the turning point, a large cargo ship was overtaking us, obviously headed for the same point we were. I was on the bridge as both vessels converged. Since we were the privileged ship, that is, we had the right of way, we waited for the other ship to reduce speed, change course or take some action to avoid collision. The captain was on the bridge of our ship, observing the other ship through binoculars. As we thundered along at about 17 knots, I wondered who would win this game of “chicken.” According to the Rules of the Road, the privileged ship must maintain course and speed until “only the actions of both vessels can avoid a collision.” When I was the captain of my ships, I made sure that I never allowed myself to wait until I was in the “jaws of collision,” before taking evasive action. The captain of the tanker I was on, however, didn’t seem willing to relinquish his right of way.

As the two ships reached what I estimated were several hundred yards distance from each other, my ship blew its whistle, attempted to raise the other ship in voice radio and finally flashing light. It became obvious to me and certainly the captain of our ship that there was no one on the bridge or even on deck. I began to check out mentally where the nearest life jacket locker and lifeboat were. By this time the two ships were, I estimated, about 100 yards apart. I could see the other ship clearly without binoculars. Suddenly, some one came out of a weathertight door on the deck below the bridge. He yawned and stretched, then did a double take when he saw our ship filling his field of vision. He raced up the ladder to the bridge, and shortly thereafter, the other ship began backing full speed and dropped rapidly aft. I couldn’t detect any visible sign of anxiety on the part of our captain, but the knot in my stomach didn’t go away for quite a while. You can be sure that this incident found a prominent place in my post-voyage report!

There is no requirement of which I am aware, to report near collisions at sea, however, if I have had so many such incidents in my seagoing career, they must not be rare. Although the Rules of the Road do not recommend early evasive action to avoid collision, I have always taken this course of action. It’s easier on the digestive system.

Written October 31, 2006

Save

Save

Save

Save

Save

Save

Save

Save

Save

Save

Share this:
Posted in U.S. Coast Guard in Vietnam, Vietnam War | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

My Grandfather Was a Marine, by Captain LeRoy Reinburg, Jr., U.S. Coast Guard–Retired

Share this:

MarineCorpsInsigniaOn Navy Day, 1928, my father, a U.S. Coast Guard commander, took my older sister and me to the Washington Navy Yard to hear President Calvin Coolidge give an address to Navy dignitaries and guests. As we passed through the gate, a tall, broad-shouldered man in uniform saluted my father and motioned us through the gate. I was very impressed with this important-looking person and asked my father who he was. He said, “That’s a hard- boiled, topkick Marine.” As an afterthought, as we drove off, he started talking about his father, who was born in 1847 and joined the U.S. Marine Corps shortly before the Civil War. Although my memory is a little hazy about the conversation (I was only six years old), I do remember that he said his father had received a commission in the U.S. Navy during the Civil War. I don’t remember what the President spoke about that day at the Navy Yard, but I do remember that he spoke from one of the upper decks of what I thought at the time was a very large, gray Navy ship, to a crowd of people, most of whom were in uniform, seated, or standing on the dock.

Over the ensuing years, I remember my father speaking of his father from time to time, but other than saying on one occasion that my grandfather had commanded a ship during the Civil War on which his own father was serving as a master’s mate, not very many details were mentioned. My mother died at the age of 39, in 1939, when I was in high school, and my father never remarried. Later, I entered the Coast Guard Academy, my father retired in 1946 as a Rear Admiral, and I was commissioned an Ensign in 1948. I was a severe blow to me when my father died in 1956. I thought of so many things I wanted to talk to him about, but although we kept up a lively correspondence over those years, I was stationed on the West Coast and Alaska, while he had retired to the home he had built in Washington, D.C. My opportunities to visit with him were limited; I was able to get home on leave only twice after I graduated from the Academy. Once, when my ship was tied up at the U.S. Naval Station, Adak, Alaska, I phoned him. He had been on the Bering Sea Patrol before World War I, and I had a hard time convincing him that I was calling from Adak. Adak was an Aleut village of a few dozen people when he was last there in 1923 when I was born.

It was only after my father’s eldest sister died in 1962, and I was helping her husband, my uncle, sort through her effects that I discovered a document titled “Military and Naval Record of Louis Reinburg,” her father and my grandfather. It was the first confirmation in writing I had seen that my grandfather was indeed a Marine. He enlisted in the U.S. Marine Corps as a boy, ten years of age, on August 29, 1856. He reenlisted at Washington, DC, on October 13, 1860; was honorably discharged at Washington, DC, October 9, 1863; was appointed Mate, U.S. Navy, November 28, 1863; and was honorably discharged February 8, 1868 at the age of twenty-two, with twelve years service!

Before the outbreak of the Civil War, Louis Reinburg served at the Philadelphia Barracks on the USS Jamestown; at the Washington, DC, Barracks; and on the USS Plymouth. He manned Fort McHenry and Fort Washington, Maryland, until relieved by the regular garrison. He was transferred to the USS Pawnee, March 4, 1861, and sailed to relieve MAJ E.A. Anderson at Fort Sumpter. He was at the burning of the Norfolk Navy Yard in 1861, and also in the fights at Aquia Creek and Mathias Point. He was transferred to the USS Sabine in 1861 and served blockading duty off Charleston, SC, and rescued shipwrecked Marines before the assault on Port Royal. (His vessel was too large to cross the bar.)

USS Sabine (photo from Library of Congress collections)

USS Sabine (photo from Library of Congress collections)

Louis Reinburg was “invalided” to the Brooklyn, NY, Hospital, in 1862, after having been wounded in action. After recovering from his wounds, he was transferred to the USS Brandywine before being honorably discharged from the Corps, and appointed Mate, U.S. Navy. He served as Mate on USS Teaser, USS Wasp, and USS Supply, and participated in all engagements and skirmishes of the “Potomac Flotilla,” from February 28, 1863, to the end of the war. At the end of the war, he was honorably discharged, with the thanks of the Navy Department, February 8, 1868, upon returning from the “Brazilian Squadron” on the USS Supply.

Also in Louis Reinburg’s record was a resolution of thanks of the U.S. Congress to Commodore Cadwaladar Ringgold and the officers and crew of the United States Ship “Sabine.” The resolution read

That the thanks of Congress are hereby tendered to Commodore Ringgold, the officers, petty officers, and men of the United States Ship “Sabine,” for the daring and skill displayed in rescuing the crew of the steam transport “Governor,” wrecked in a gale on the first day of November, eighteen hundred and sixty-one, having on board a battalion of United States Marines under the command of Major John G. Reynolds, and in search for, and rescue of the United States line-of-battle ship “Vermont,” disabled in a gale upon the twenty-sixth of February last, with her crew and freight.

Sec, 2. That the Secretary of the Navy be directed to communicate the foregoing resolution to Commodore Ringgold, and through him to the officers and men under his command.

     Approved March 7th, 1864.

If such could be possible, my sense of pride in the United States Marine Corps increased after reading of my grandfather’s exploits in that service. I say this because I have always admired the Corps, but knowing that I am a direct descendant of a Marine has made me aware of a kinship that I will always treasure. Just recently, my good friend Captain Sam Collins, U.S. Navy (Ret.) told me that when he is at a function where the Marine Corps Hymn is played, he looks around at the audience, and if he does not see a Marine standing, he stands. I wonder if the Marines would mind if I did the same to show my admiration for that magnificent service.

Grave site of Louis C. Reinburg, Congressional Cemetery, Washington, DC

Grave site of Louis C. Reinburg, Congressional Cemetery, Washington, DC

Save

Save

Save

Save

Save

Save

Share this:
Posted in U.S. Marine Corps | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The Training Ship DANMARK, by Captain LeRoy Reinburg, Jr., U.S. Coast Guard–Retired

Share this:

Training ship DANMARK

Training ship DANMARK

In 1933, the Danish Government completed construction of a 1,700-ton training ship, the DANMARK. It was not intended to be a mechanically driven ocean ship but a full-rigged ship, whose main propulsion was 17,000 square feet of canvas sail. The purpose of the ship was to train primarily young men to be seamen in the Danish merchant marine. Although the main propulsion was sail, the steel-hulled ship also was equipped with a 250-horsepower diesel engine, which was used so seldom that it was mostly run periodically to make sure that it was in good operating condition.

The DANMARK was eminently successful in producing officers with knowledge of seamanship, navigation, small boat handling, the effect of the wind, and tides. It was manned by a small cadre of experienced officers and seamen, skilled in training others in the lore of the sea. It made periodic cruises to distant ports as a part of its training program, and it was on one of these cruises to the islands of the Caribbean and along the coast of the United States that it stopped in Jacksonville, Florida, in August 1939, just prior to returning home. During this port visit, Germany invaded Denmark, and the DANMARK was left with no place to go and no financial means of support. The crew got some support from odd jobs ashore and much help from the local populace, but it became obvious that this was insufficient for the upkeep of the ship and its crew.

U.S Coast Guard Academy cadets training aboard the Danmark during World War II

U.S Coast Guard Academy cadets training aboard the Danmark during World War II

On December 8, 1941, the U.S. Government received the following notice from the Commanding Officer of the DANMARK, Captain Hansen: “In view of the latest development, the cadets, officers, and the captain of the Danish Government Training Vessel DANMARK unanimously place themselves and the ship at the disposal of the United States Government, to serve in any capacity the United States Government sees fit in our joint fight for victory and liberty.” And so on January 3, 1942, the DANMARK sailed up the Thames River and moored alongside the U.S. Coast Guard Academy Wharf in New London, CT. Soon thereafter, in a solemn ceremony, the Danish flag was lowered and the flag of the United States was hoisted to the gaff and would stay there as the ship trained U.S. Coast Guard officer candidates until the DANMARK was able to return to its home country.1

My first experience with the DANMARK came in 1943, when, as a brand new Coast Guard Cadet, I was introduced to chipping, wirebrushing, and painting with red lead and white paint to freshen up the hull and deck housing of the DANMARK, under the supervision of the ships’ first lieutenant, LT Roemer. Under the watchful eyes of the Danish officers and crew, I learned valuable lessons in seamanship, navigation, small boat handling, ship handling, open sea cruising, and the effects of winds, waves, tides, currents, and much, much more from the wonderfully talented and experienced Danes. These lessons I carried with me through a 30-year career in the Coast Guard, and I credit them with pulling me through many a tough situation at sea.

During three and a half years of World War II, the DANMARK trained Coast Guard Regular and Reserve cadets and contributed measurably to the national war effort. When World War II ended, the Coast Guard returned the DANMARK to the Danish Government in a moving ceremony, in which Captain Knud Hansen, master of the DANMARK took over the ship in the name of the Danish Government on September 27, 1945, King Christian’s 75th birthday. Captain Hansen and his officers received letters of appreciation from the Secretary of the Navy, James Forrestal. The U.S. Coast Guard Academy presented the ship a bronze plaque and a moving picture film illustrating the work of the DANMARK in the Academy’s service.Plaque aboard the Danmark, recognizing it's service to the U.S. Coast Guard during World War II

Captain Hansen and his officers were the recipients of glowing tribute from Connecticut Governor Raymond E. Baldwin; Rear Admiral Raymond T. McElligott, representing the Coast Guard Commandant; Admiral Russell R. Waesche; Rear Admiral James Pine, Superintendent of the Academy; and Carl L. Brun, Acting Danish Minister to the United States. Governor Baldwin was particularly complimentary in his remarks about the DANMARK. He said we come to say goodbye to the DANMARK or as we say in American slang, ‘so long,’ which means we expect you will come back soon. As a Danish training ship, the DANMARK did, in fact return on a number of occasions, the most notable of which was the 60th anniversary of their departure after the end of World War II.

July 4, 2005, Ceremony marking the Training Ship Danmark's visit to Washington, DC.

On July 4, 2005, the Training Ship Danmark visited Washington, DC.

On that occasion, the Danish Government planned the visit to Washington, D.C., and asked the Commandant of the Coast Guard to invite all Coast Guard personnel who served on the DANMARK to a reception to be held on the Pier at Maine Avenue in Southwest Washington, D.C. I was one of those who were invited, and it was a very moving ceremony. A band played the Star-Spangled Banner and the national anthem of Denmark. After welcoming remarks by Karsten Ankjaer Jensen, Deputy Chief of Mission, The Royal Danish Embassy, Washington, D.C., there were remarks by Admiral James Gracey (Retired), 17th Commandant of the Coast Guard, who trained on the DANMARK, and Rear Admiral Craig E. Bone, Coast Guard Headquarters. Following this, there was a presentation of certificates to veterans by Mr. Jensen, and a reception and tours of the DANMARK by CAPT Kurt Andersen, current master of the DANMARK.

There were more than 100 former cadets who served on the DANMARK present at theevent, accompanied by their spouses, some who came all the way from the West Coast. Many of these individuals I had not seen in 50 to 60 years. It was an unforgettable occasion. At the conclusion of the ceremony, the DANMARK headed back home.

July 4, 2005, program of recognition for U.S. veterans who served on the training ship DANMARK during World War II from 1941 to 1945.

July 4, 2005, program of recognition for U.S. veterans who served on the training ship DANMARK during World War II from 1941 to 1945.

__________________________________________________________

1Derby, W. N., “Square-rigger, Twentieth Century,” Surf and Storm Magazine, February, 1943.

(Originally published in Officer Review, Vol. 50, No. 5, October 2010, The Military Order of the World Wars.)

Editor’s note, September 20, 2015: In his article “Danmark’s Contribution to Coast Guard Seamanship and Leadership,” Admiral James M. Loy, U.S. Coast Guard, provides additional history and background on the important role the DANMARK played in Coast Guard training and seamanship. Admiral Loy writes “When we see the graceful beauty of this full rigged ship, we do well to look past the billowing sails and to recall their purpose. Danmark’s service to the U.S. Coast Guard was not designed to provide a picturesque setting for summer training. It was designed to win a war we were not initially favored to win…. We may fairly credit Danmark also with motivating the Coast Guard to obtain Eagle…. Simply put, Danmark reconnected the Coast Guard with its sailing heritage.”

Share this:
Posted in U. S. Coast in World War II, U.S. Coast Guard Academy, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 4 Comments

“Friendly Fire Isn’t,” by Captain LeRoy Reinburg, Jr., U.S. Coast Guard–Retired

Share this:

There are many tragedies in warfare but some of the most tragic, because they are frequently avoidable, are deaths or injury caused by the (oxymoron) “friendly fire.”

The military term for friendly fire is the more descriptive word fratricide. These tragedies are avoidable because they are, in many cases, caused by errors. Although I was not directly involved in the incident I am about to describe, my ship was a part of the same operation, and I knew the commanding officer of the ship involved.

Shrapnel holes in roof of U.S. Navy Riverine Force Base, Song Ong Doc, Vietnam, 1970, caused by U.S. Coast Guard cutter Sherman firing on friendlies, 1970.

Shrapnel holes in roof of U.S. Navy Riverine Force Base, Song Ong Doc, Vietnam, 1970, caused by U.S. Coast Guard cutter Sherman firing on friendlies, 1970.

In the spring of 1970, the ship I commanded, the U.S. Coast Guard High Endurance Cutter (HEC) Pontchartrain, was deployed to the Republic of Vietnam (RVN), as a unit of Coast Guard Squadron Three, an organization attached to Commander U.S. Seventh Fleet. We were a part of U.S. Navy Task Force 115, the Commander, Coastal Surveillance Force. Our assignment was patrolling the offshore coastal areas of RVN to interdict enemy trawlers, which were constantly attempting to smuggle personnel, munitions, and supplies to their forces ashore. In addition, we provided Naval Gunfire Support (NGFS) to friendly forces. Our area of operation was divided into nine patrol areas stretching from the Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) between North and South Vietnam to the Cambodian border in the Gulf of Thailand.

These areas were numbered One at the DMZ and Nine at the border between RVN and Cambodia. It was in the latter area, that is, patrol area Nine, where a friendly-fire incident took place. The Pontchartrain had just arrived in area Nine to relieve the “outchopping” HEC that was involved in the friendly-fire incident. The term “chopping” connotes changing of operational control, and the “out” indicates that they are leaving the operational command, in this case, the U.S. Seventh Fleet, and heading back to CONUS (Continental U.S.).

As a part of the relief ritual, my ship anchored close to where the other ship was anchored, in fire support position several hundred yards from the U.S. Navy Riverine Force Base, Song Ong Doc, Republic of Vietnam. I went by small boat over to the other Coast Guard ship with the Engineer Officer, the Operations Officer, and the Gunnery Officer to exchange information on activity, intelligence, and any other items of current operational interest. I knew from monitoring the fleet broadcast that the ship we were relieving had been very recently involved in a friendly-fire incident, but I was not aware of any of the details.

Photo of U.S. Navy Riverine Force Base at Song Ong Doc, Vietnam, June 1970

U.S. Navy Riverine Force Base Song Ong Doc, Vietnam, June 1970. Photo by LeRoy Reinburg, Jr.

I didn’t know what to expect when I spoke to the commanding officer, whom I had known for many years. He greeted me warmly, and we discussed operations. I had hoped that we could discuss the friendly-fire incident because, not only was I curious, but I also thought there might be some important and timely lessons to be learned. And I was not disappointed.

The commanding officer of the other HEC described to me in great detail what had happened, and as he spoke, he became very emotional. Even after a thorough internal investigation, it could not be determined what had caused the error. The Navy Base at Song Ong Doc called the ship in the middle of the night with a call for fire on a sensor activation (these were called “Duffle Bag”). The base was ringed with precisely charted acoustic, magnetic, and seismic sensors to detect any attempted attack by the Viet Cong. When the base called the ship and asked for Naval Gunfire Support (NGFS) on a specific sensor activation, the ship would respond with its 5″/38-caliber gun, using HECVT (proximity-fused high-capacity explosive) projectiles. In this case, the call was for ten rounds over target. Midway through the firing, the base called for ceasefire because the rounds were exploding over the base. Unfortunately, by the time this command reached the gunmount, the last round was already in the air.

The CO said that the whole incident was devastating to him. One of the worst things for him was when he went ashore to the base that same day to face the Navy personnel. Several of them had been killed, and a number were wounded by the shell fragments. Since the ship had a doctor, the Medevac helicopters brought the casualties out to the ship for emergency treatment. All of the ship’s company had to face the very real consequences of the ship’s actions, and all were very deeply affected. The CO told me that in the future, before he gave the command “Battery released,” he, personally, would check to see if the gun barrel was pointed toward the target. Privately, I thought this would not only be impractical but would also introduce an unacceptable delay in answering a call for fire. He also told me that he intended to retire as soon as the ship returned to its homeport. I don’t know whether he actually did retire four years before his mandatory retirement date, but I do know that the shadow of this tragic incident remained with me for the balance of our deployment.

[Written January 17, 2008]

Webmaster’s note: GMGC Tom Humerick, U.S. Navy–Retired, who was at the Riverine Base at Song Ong Doc during this friendly-fire tragedy, provides a very detailed account of the events in an article on the website Jack’s Joint: “Tragedy in Vietnam.”

Visit the Brownwater Navy Vietnam website for additional accounts and information on the Coast Guard ships in Vietnam, Song Ong Doc, and this friendly-fire incident in May 1970, including those accounts by Coast Guard personnel Dave Desiderio and Tom Lackey.

See additional discussion by L. Reinburg of his experiences in the Coast Guard during the Vietnam War in “A Coast Guardsman’s Recollections of Vietnam.”

Share this:
Posted in U.S. Coast Guard in Vietnam, USCGC PONTCHARTRAIN | Tagged , , , , , | 9 Comments

“You Got Him!” by Captain LeRoy Reinburg, Jr., U.S. Coast Guard–Retired

Share this:

LeRoy Reinburg with his son, LeRoy Reinburg, Jr.

LeRoy Reinburg with his son, LeRoy Reinburg, Jr.

When I was young, my mother used to tell me that my father (Rear Admiral LeRoy Reinburg, USCG) never talked about his World War I experiences. That’s why I was surprised that, beginning when I was about 10 years old and we were out together, he frequently spoke to me about that time in his life.

Photo of LCDR LeRoy Reinburg taken after his return from Europe in World War I

LCDR LeRoy Reinburg, USCG, shortly after his return from Europe in World War I. The two gold chevrons above his sleeve rank insignia connote 12 months in the war zone.

He had command of two ships in European waters, the first was the USS OSSIPPEE CG, which he took from Portland, Maine, its home port, to Milford Haven, Wales, which became its overseas home port. The second ship he commanded was the USS DRUID, a converted yacht on which he, the commanding officer (CO), was the only Coastguardsman. The remainder of the ship’s company was U.S. Naval personnel. He had been assigned to the DRUID by Admiral Simms, USN, the commander of all U.S. Naval Forces in the European theatre of operations. My father was an experienced CO on the OSSIPPEE, who had an executive officer (XO) whom my father had qualified for command. The Navy CO of the DRUID contracted the flu and had to be removed from the ship, but the DRUID had no qualified XO to relieve him.

The particular incident I remember my father describing to me happened when he was CO of the OSSIPPEE, a ship assigned to escort and convoy duty and antisubmarine warfare patrol. His ship was attached to a squadron of British ships under the command of a British Royal Navy Commodore. The squadron was assigned to patrol the Straits of Gibraltar to keep German submarines from transiting the Straits. Late one dark, clear, moonless night, while patrolling close to the Spanish Mediterranean shore, a lookout on the OSSIPPEE sighted several lights. As the ship closed in on the lights, hurried activity on the deck of what appeared to be a fishing vessel was observed, as cargo was transferred to an unlighted vessel alongside. Suspicious, my father, who had been called to the bridge, ordered the ship to proceed closer to the unidentified vessels. Gradually, the silhouette of the darkened vessel took the shape of a surfaced submarine. My father ordered full speed ahead and sounded general quarters, intending to ram the submarine, which by now had detected the approaching threat and was in the process of breaking away from the trawler and making a crash dive.

As the OSSIPPEE passed over the partially submerged submarine, my father said his ship shuddered as the submarine bumped along its keel. Stern and bridge rack depth charges set on 50 feet were dropped, and my father said their explosions were so violent that he thought the OSSIPPEE’s stern was blown off. All engines were stopped on the OSSIPPEE and the ASDIC listening device was monitored constantly until daybreak, but no engine noises were detected. As dawn broke, a large oil slick was observed, which was intermingled with papers, furniture, and other debris. The British Navy Commodore had been notified of the incident, and his flagship was present at daybreak, as the flotsam from the attack was clearly revealed in the bright morning sun.

According to my father’s account, the flagship moved close to the OSSIPPEE, and the Commodore, using a megaphone, called out my father’s name and said: “You’ve got him! You’ve got the Hun!” Picking up his own megaphone my father called back, “I guess that means I’ll get 500 pounds in gold,” which was the bounty the British government had placed on German submarines. The Commodore came back quickly, informing my father that this only applied to British subjects. Subsequent to this, Admiral Simms advised my father that he was to be recommended for a Navy Cross.

Several years after the war, when my father had still not received the medal, he contacted the Navy Department and was told that they had found evidence that he had indeed been recommended for the Navy Cross, but the citation had been lost. He was directed to prepare a new citation, which he did, and was later, in 1921, awarded this decoration. I have the original of this citation; however, for some reason, it makes no mention of the submarine-sinking episode.

Plaque showing LeRoy Reinburg's Navy Cross citation

LeRoy Reinburg’s citation for the Navy Cross displayed at the U.S. Coast Guard Academy’s Hall of Heroes.

Many years later, when I was a Commander in the Coast Guard and had command of my own ship, an elderly, retired Coast Guard officer, who’s name I cannot recall, came on board my ship and asked by name to see me. I was always happy to see and greet any retired Coastguardsman, but it was clear that he had a special reason to look me up, which he had done through the District Office. It seemed he had served on my father’s ship, the OSSIPPEE, during World War I, and finding that his son was on a ship close to where he retired, wanted to express his great regard for my father. In the jargon of the service, we “shot the breeze” for over an hour. During the course of this conversation, I asked him if he remembered the submarine-sinking incident. He did and gave me his very fascinating version of the event. This officer, who was the officer of the deck, called my father with the sighting and was present during the entire operation.

According to his account, as soon as it became clear that the darkened ship was a submarine, my father relieved this officer of the conn, and gave the orders to drop the stern rack depth charges, after the submarine had been “run over.” The next thing my father did was to race to the port wing of the bridge and personally release the depth charges in the bridge rack, then turn and run to the starboard wing to release those charges. The detent on this rack, however, stuck, and the charges refused to roll off the rack. My father, a powerfully built man, then jumped astride the bridge wing rail, and one by one lifted the 450-pound depth charges from their rack and threw them over the side! This incredible feat, attested to by an eyewitness, overwhelmed me. Why had my father not told me this aspect of the incident? And why, when he was asked by the Navy to write up the citation, had he made no mention of it? I have wondered about this for the last thirty years.

(Originally published in Officer Review, Vol. 47 No. 3, October 2007, The Military Order of the World Wars.)

Save

Share this:
Posted in U.S. Coast Guard in World War I | Tagged , | Leave a comment

“A Coast Guardsman’s Recollections of Vietnam” by Captain LeRoy Reinburg, Jr., U.S. Coast Guard–Retired

Share this:

During most of 1970, the Coast Guard Cutter PONTCHARTRAIN (WHEC-70), of which I was the commanding officer, was deployed to Vietnam as a unit of Coast Guard Squadron THREE, a part of Commander, Cruiser/Destroyer Group, U.S. SEVENTH Fleet.

Photo of Squadron Three insignia aboard U.S. Coast Guard cutter PONTCHARTRAIN, Vietnam, 1970.

U.S. Coast Guard cutter PONTCHARTRAIN Squadron Three insignia, Vietnam, 1970. Photo by LeRoy Reinburg, Jr.

PONTCHARTRAIN was a 255-foot, single-screw high endurance cutter, with a steam driven, turbo-electric propulsion system, with a wartime complement of 230 enlisted personnel and 25 officers. When we were operating off the coast of the Republic of Vietnam, we were under the operational control of the Commander, U.S. Naval Offshore Patrol Force (CTF 115), code named MARKET TIME, tasked with interdicting North Vietnamese trawlers and other craft which were constantly attempting to pierce the barrier patrol and resupply the Viet Cong with personnel, ammunition, and other supplies. In addition, we provided Naval Gunfire Support (NGF) to friendly forces ashore with our five-inch, 38-caliber general-purpose gun. We were also armed with 20mm machine guns on each bridge wing, a quad 40mm machine gun mounted forward of the bridge, and six deck-mounted 50-caliber machine guns. Just prior to our departure from Long Beach, California, our home port, we were directed to remove our sonar, and Antisubmarine Warfare acoustic torpedoes. As I will explain later, we regretted the loss of the sonar.

Republic of Vietnam Navy patrol boat alongside U.S. Coast Guard cutter Pontchartrain, Vietnam, 1970. Photo by LeRoy Reinburg, Jr.

Republic of Vietnam Navy patrol boat alongside U.S. Coast Guard cutter Pontchartrain, Vietnam, 1970. Photo by LeRoy Reinburg, Jr.

The waters adjacent to the Republic of Vietnam were divided into nine patrol areas, with Market Time Area One bordering the Demilitarized Zone and Area Nine from the southern tip of the Ca Mau Peninsula to the Cambodian Border. This latter area covered a substantial portion of the Gulf of Thailand. Each of these areas extended out to 12 miles from the shore. We boarded dozens of junks looking for contraband and draft dodgers, answered numerous calls for fire, and provided MEDCAPS (medical treatment) to the villagers. Our patrols in Areas One through Eight do not bring forth any memorable incidents, except for us watching a constant stream of Russian cargo ships steaming north to Hanoi Harbor with deck loads of tanks and trucks, and returning with empty decks. According to seagoing practice, we exchanged flashing light signals with ships we encountered in international waters, which almost always returned our queries with their name, port of origin, and port of destination. After establishing contact, we would frequently exchange pleasantries. The Russian ships, however, never answered our signals. Although we had frequent calls for fire in these areas, it was Area Nine where much of our action took place.

U.S. Coast Guard cutter PONTCHARTRAIN receiving 5-inch powder cases, UNREP (Rearm), Vietnam, 1970. Photo by LeRoy Reinburg, Jr.

U.S. Coast Guard cutter PONTCHARTRAIN receiving 5-inch powder cases, UNREP (Rearm), Vietnam, 1970. Photo by LeRoy Reinburg, Jr.

In Area Nine, there had been very few attempts by North Vietnamese infiltrators. We would patrol on a random basis, and then usually, anchor at night about 500 yards off of Song Ong Doc, the site of a U.S. Navy Riverine Force Base, and provide Naval Gun Fire Support. The base was on “ammie” barges, which were moored to the shore and provided a dock for Swift Boats and PBRs to moor, and galvanized iron structures, containing an operations center and berthing space for the off-duty boat crews. The ammie barges were heavily sandbagged, with machine gun emplacements, and the base was ringed at a distance of about several hundred yards by acoustic, magnetic, and seismic sensors, precisely charted to alert the base of any attempt to overrun it. The base had armed helicopter support available to it from a nearby U.S. Army unit, but their best defense was our five-inch gun. At night, Viet Cong would try to attack the base, and we would receive frequent calls for fire on a specific sensor activation. Some nights there would be no action, then we would get three or more calls. When we received these calls we would sound general quarters, condition II, a modified version of general quarters for shore bombardment (SHOBA), in which only the gun crew, combat information center, fire control, and ship control would report to their battle stations. A strictly formatted call for fire message would include a target description, specific coordinates, and type of ammunition requested, typically HECVT (high explosive proximity fuse, set to explode above the target.)

A break after a firing mission aboard U.S. Coast Guard cutter PONTCHARTRAIN, off the coast of Vietnam, 1970. Photo by LeRoy Reinburg, Jr.

A break after a firing mission aboard U.S. Coast Guard cutter PONTCHARTRAIN, off the coast of Vietnam, 1970. Photo by LeRoy Reinburg, Jr.

The first few times we answered a call for fire, we were not very fast, but after we had done it a number of times, we got progressively better. Eventually, from the sounding of the general alarm, Condition II, we had rounds in the air in four minutes! This was pretty astonishing, considering personnel woke up to the alarm, and raced to their stations, acquired the target, brought ammunition to the mount, reported manned and ready, and answered the “battery released” order. All during my tour, it was apparent that most of the action at sea and ashore took place at night. We had many sleepless nights, and I made sure that during the day, we had periods during which all hands were able to stand down, rather than push ourselves to exhaustion.

Anchoring close to shore at night had its own hazards. The enemy made frequent attempts to penetrate our defenses with swimmer sappers, who tried to attach limpet mines to the side of the ship. This was when I regretted the loss of our sonar. It was

Photo of USCGC Pontchartrain CO CDR LeRoy Reinburg, Jr.

CDR LeRoy Reinburg, Jr., U.S. Coast Guard. Commanding Officer of USCGC Pontchartrain (WHEC-70), Vietnam, July 1970.

a very effective method of discouraging swimmers, since the noise of the sonar signal was a powerful deterrent to approaching swimmers. We found it necessary to slide a collar up and down the anchor chain all night at periodic intervals, have armed personnel roaming the decks, shooting at anything in the water, and at random intervals detonate concussion grenades alongside of the ship. The entrance to the river off which we anchored was full of floating coconuts, which at night resembled a swimmer’s head. The rattle of gunfire and the detonating of grenades made it difficult to get to sleep. It was like trying to sleep inside a bass drum.

After weeks of this routine, it was inevitable that the deck guards would fall into a routine and become less vigilant. One night, we heard a deafening explosion to the north of us, and monitoring the fleet broadcast, found that a Navy LST moored off another Riverine Base, had a limpet mine blow a hole in the engine spaces, killing several sailors, and causing severe flooding. This was a heads up for all hands, who got the message that we might be next. It wasn’t necessary from then on to make them aware that perpetual vigilance was essential.

Deck litter during naval gunfire support mission, USCGC PONTCHARTRAIN, Vietnam, 1970. Photo by LeRoy Reinburg, Jr.

Deck litter during naval gunfire support mission, USCGC PONTCHARTRAIN, Vietnam, 1970. Photo by LeRoy Reinburg, Jr.

While we were at anchor off Song Ong Doc, we had frequent visits from Navy Swift Boats, PBRs, and Coast Guard 82-foot patrol boats, wanting water, fuel, materiel repair support, and just a change of venue to a more stable platform for a few hours. The CO of the Riverine Base, a Navy Lieutenant Commander, would come out from ashore to confer on operations and discuss how we could improve executing our mission. I, in turn, would go ashore to visit the Base with the ship’s operations officer and gunnery officer so that we could understand each other’s strengths and limitations.

A detachment of Navy Seals operated in the area of the Base, conducting clandestine (Black) operations against the enemy. On their many visits to the PONTCHARTRAIN, I engaged a number of them in conversations and heard some of the most fascinating tales I had ever heard. I’ve listened to enough sea stories to be able to detect embellishment or tall tales, but these tales were recounted in such a matter-of-fact, candid, and sincere manner, I was sure they were, if anything, understated. One told me that on one recent occasion, he and his fellow Seals made one of their regular forays into the local jungle to harass, collect intelligence, and disorient the Viet Cong, who were constantly attempting to overrun local ARVN (Army of the Republic of Vietnam) and U.S. military bases. They stole up behind a small group sitting around a tiny campfire, silently capturing two of them before the others realized what was happening. As the other Viet Cong in the group came out of their daze from the suddenness of the attack, they abandoned their weapons, fled to the bank of the nearby river, and seemingly disappeared. After the Seals reconnoitered the area, they noticed two reeds in the shallow water near the bank of the river that seemed different from the surrounding growth and concluded that the missing enemy was breathing through them while they were submerged. Slowly the Seals crept up on the reeds, snatched them from the water and waited until the VC could hold their breaths no longer, and burst to the surface, at which that time, the Seals captured the VC. After hearing this story, I understood the degree of stress these sailors lived with day in and day out.

Because of this and other like stories involving even more intense enemy contact, I was not surprised when the Seals would ask us if they could spend a weekend of R&R on our ship! After all, we had a safe, air-conditioned space for them to sleep, hot showers, three hot meals a day, medical treatment (we had a doctor on board), and a ship’s exchange for them to buy soft drinks, “pogie bait,” and health and comfort items. After the crew of my ship had a chance to talk to these tough, combat-wise heroes and appreciate the severe stress and primitive conditions they lived under every day, I never heard any member of our crew complaining about their working and living conditions. I think it was a sobering message to all of us that we had a pretty good deal compared to our brothers in arms ashore.

Shrapnel holes in roof of U.S. Navy Riverine Force Base, Song Ong Doc, Vietnam, 1970, caused by U.S. Coast Guard cutter Sherman firing on friendlies, 1970.

Shrapnel holes in roof of U.S. Navy Riverine Force Base, Song Ong Doc, Vietnam, 1970, caused by U.S. Coast Guard cutter Sherman firing on friendlies, 1970.

(Originally published in Officer Review, Vol. 45 No. 6, January 2006, The Military Order of the World Wars.)

Share this:
Posted in U.S. Coast Guard in Vietnam, USCGC PONTCHARTRAIN, Vietnam War | Tagged , , , , , , | 7 Comments